Anonymous asked: Thank you for your post today. It really needed to be said. I also feel the same way about the infamous 'hate-reading' that occurred a few months ago (in your absence.) Do whatever you want in private, but it says a lot about someone's character when they publicly seek attention for their negativity & defend it. So many people were hurt by that and never said anything. I've felt my own muse deteriorate because of it, though I know it probably wasn't directed at me. Think before you post, people!

You’re welcome, anon, and thanks for your kind words but I’m not about to call out anyone’s character for things done or said in the past.

To be honest, in my early days on tumblr I think I was guilty of similar things. There really is a fine line. For example, I could make a post saying I really just can’t read stories that involve cheating (I think I did at one point). Obviously my intentions in that post would not be to say that stories that include infidelity are poorly written or bad - “Hero of the Story” by atetheredmind is one of the best stories out there, and cheating is central to its plot. Instead, I’d really just be trying to express that I can’t stomach the idea of cheating, and reading about it causes me emotional distress. But the thing is, as people read my post and started chiming in, the dozens of people who had written excellent stories including infidelity might begin to feel awful. 

Now, do I have the right to talk about whatever I want? Yes.

Should I? That’s the real question.

Is it so important that I feel solidarity over my personal inability to read about infidelity that I risk hurting other people? In this case, the answer is probably no. But if I posted it, would I be a rotten person? Probably not. It would, however, not only potentially hurt others, but put me in a position that makes people assume things about my posting intentions that would reflect pretty badly on me.

Sometimes, there are things in fics that are so damaging to those that read them that it might behove you to step up and say something. But it really is such a grey area. And I’m not even actually talking about negative reviews. Sure, I’d be the first to admit that real constructive criticism is almost always lacking, which typically renders negative reviews worthless and hurtful, but I think that the posts on tumblr are much more damaging, as you can not only see the OP, but you can see all the other people chiming in to “gang up on you” whether they actually have you in mind or not.

This is the crux of the issue to me - focusing on the negative aspects of what others create, and just generally hating on things makes a person feel really powerful. It forges bonds between people very quickly, although those connections are often unsubstantial and fickle. But mutual hate brings people together, albeit in what I consider a cheap way. Hating something carries no personal risk. Very rarely are we judged for what we dislike. Our loves and interests, however, are incredibly risky, as we carry them so close to our hearts. If I tell you I love cartoons, and you express a complete disdain for them, it’s probably going to cut me pretty deep. If we sit and talk about how much we despise reality television, however, we’ll both feel like we really understand one another, even if that’s completely untrue. 

It’s a lot harder to be mindful of what you post, frankly, because of all these things. And sometimes, even often, people really mean nothing by it. I’m not calling out malice, at least I hope I’m not. I’m calling out thoughtlessness, which can be equally, if not more damaging to an online community such as the one that exists now. And if someone doesn’t care about that, or think it doesn’t matter, that’s their prerogative. 

So that’s a pretty long response from someone who said she wasn’t going to talk on this subject any more, but it sums up all of the reactions that I have seen or that have come my way from my original post. I’m not of the school that says everyone needs to be nice to each other and we need to live in a field full of rainbows - I rarely follow people back for my own personal reasons that have nothing to do with them. I am certain that this inaction is passively hurtful to some, though my intentions are not to make people feel badly.

What I am saying is that certain type of posting actively hurts way more people than it helps, and people need to be cognizant of that. If they want to continue, that’s fine, but I personally think it’s somewhat unethical, and am going to stand up and say so. 

Anonymous asked: instead of the wife taking the husband's last name, there is a growing trend among newlyweds of picking an entirely new name for the two of them. so when you marry rye you must choose to live as the mellarks.

image

Anonymous asked: Don't be afraid! I had Paragard put it, and it literally felt like a sharp pinch for a second, and then it was over. I had some light cramping on the way home from the doctor's office, but by the time I got home, that was gone, too. It really, really wasn't bad. :)

This was really reassuring, so thanks. Unfortunately, the doctor is on vacation (they said he’d be in today, liars), so it’s not happening after all.

0 notes

Anonymous asked: Did you ever watch silver linings playbook? I remember you saying that you didn't want to because you thought it might look cheesy or something.

Actually I never watched it because I find the title horrific for reasons I can’t put into words, and are probably incorrect anyway. So no, I’ve never seen it. Though I don’t dislike any of the cast, I’m not a die-hard fan of really anyone in the movie, either, so it’s unlikely I will see it anytime soon. 

Anonymous asked: So glad you're back! I wanted to thank you because you unknowingly made me start watching Sherlock (I was curious because I saw a lot of it on your blog and you said your OC Alder was partly based on Sherlock the character), and it has become one of my favorite things in the world, so thank you <3

Thank YOU, anon! I’m really really glad you got into Sherlock because it’s pretty much the best thing ever.

0 notes

Anonymous asked: You're back! *reaction GIF of someone hugging another person and that person having a 'wtf face'* I've missed you.

Did you mean this gif???

Anonymous asked: this is ridiculous

image

Anonymous asked: Did you notice that Gale wasn't unconscious in that scene. He definitely looked like he was in pain but he was conscious. He is going to be completely awake during the Everthorne kiss at the table.

Well, he might be, but then again, he might not. Hell, they might not even include that scene, or that part of it.

The reason he was unconscious during the kiss wasn’t because he passed out from the pain, but because he was given medication to make him sleep so he felt less pain. It’s entirely possible, given the lack of Madge, that they’ll use that moment to further develop Prim’s “healer” character, and somehow give her knowledge of sleep-inducing medication. Since they skipped the sleep-syrup part in THG, there’s no reason they have to go into the difference between morphling and sleep syrup. 

So, basically what I’m saying is this is a free-for-all in terms of what is going to happen, so if you want Gale unconscious (or conscious, really) during that kiss, don’t lose (or hold onto) hope, because God only knows if that kiss will even happen, and, if it does, how and why. 

1 note

Anonymous asked: What did you think of the last picture? The one with Effie, Peeta and Katniss. I personally like how Katniss is wearing an archery finger tab in all the pictures from the Tour. Some great subtle imagery.

I’m hoping it’s a quiet moment approaching the building, instead of one in front of a crowd, because Peeta looks so vulnerable (like he does in all the stills, which, hell, that’s fine cause jhutch can pull the best vulnerable face on earth so why wouldn’t Lionsgate market that?). In Catching Fire he basically works the crowds like they’re his marionette, so I think he’d look a bit more self-confident when entering an enormous party.

That being said, I over think everything, and film stuff has never really been my forte, so I’d take my hesitant opinion with a grain of salt. 

Anonymous asked: Hi obviously-not-essie ! So glad you're back!! I probably shrieked a little when I saw that gorgeous icon on my dash. and just kept chanting 'please be real, please be real' while scrolling through the reblogs of Aang and Kora and opinions on THG and mentions of Eo and assure myself that this totally not silvercistern.

image

Oh this is super sweet, anon, but this isn’t going to be a hugely active blog. I don’t really have a ton of time for tumbling, so it’s basically a queue and me answering some asks sometimes, but I’m (not) here!

0 notes